At his new site The Blogging of the President: 2004, Chris Lydon writes:
Once upon a time the reporters who covered the presidential candidates were dubbed “the boys on the bus,” and in my first campaign assignment with The New York Times in 1972 I was one of them. In the campaign of 2004 I feel more like a Martian in a baseball dugout. [...]
I'd like you to join me please in a new conversation around the presidential campaign. It feels like time to relearn a game in which all the rules have changed. We are looking everyday at a digital transformation of the constitutional ritual in which the American people choose their chieftain. So the invitation to all comers is to keep talking and posting till we get this story straight. Give me your comments, your essays, your emails, and together we will figure this out.
Continue reading "The Blogging of the President" »
We've written before about stenography journalism, when journalists simply report what politicians have to say, making no effort to root out what's true, false, or misleading in their words.
I applaud this AP article by Nedra Pickler for making that effort. But, I wonder, does it cloud the truth up even more in the process?
Continue reading "Risks in Straying from the Political Script" »
Howard Dean's campaign signals a new type of politics, a revolution, says Jay Rosen, that has left journalists out:
A control revolution, which took almost 50 years to play out, had by 2000 completed most of its work. Both campaigns were able to restrict the candidate to message-speak. At times, the two nominees sounded like tracking polls with vocal chords. Bush and Gore made themselves pitifully small for us—button pushers for the tiny portion of uncommitted voters the pros had identified as everything. But 95 percent of the country lay outside this everything. And somehow that fact too had gotten away from them.
“Well, of course!” said the professionals in journalism. "This is how the game is played. Citizens of the United States, let us to explain winning to you." But this too was a game—inside baseball—that had gotten away from the players. It was easy for journalists to think of themselves as outsiders, (observers) but then chatter away as insiders (participants), and never face the fullness of this contradiction.
But journalists have a chance to get back on the grassroots gravy train, Rosen says:
Continue reading "The Campaign That Wasn't There" »
Over at PressThink, Jay Rosen writes about the President's Thanksgiving visit to Baghdad. I think his characterization is really interesting: He calls such events "co-equal with the publicity they generate" and says they "could not exist without that publicity."
That blows my mind. We're talking about political events which the press attends because they're important... but which are only important because the press attends them.
Continue reading "The Feedback Loop" »
Recent Comments